Volume 6, 2001
|Page(s)||443 - 466|
|Published online||15 August 2002|
Comparison of active control techniques over a dihedral plane
M.A.C.S., Université de Valenciennes, le Mont Houy, 59313 Valenciennes Cedex 9, France; email@example.com.
2 M.A.B., Université Bordeaux 1, 33405 Talence, France.
This work is devoted to the numerical comparison of four active control techniques in order to increase the pressure recovery generated by the deceleration of a slightly compressible viscous flow over a dihedral plane. It is performed by the use of vortex generator jets and intrusive sensors. The governing equations, the two-dimensional direct numerical simulation code and the flow configuration are first briefly recalled. Then, the objective of the control is carefully displayed, and the uncontrolled flow described. The main part of this work deals with the explanation, the implementation and the comparison of four active control strategies: closed loop control, adaptative control, physical ramp control and sub-optimal control. Each of these techniques is of different nature, and results are very formative to understand what is important – or less – to make the control efficient.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 93C95 76N25 76F40 76G25
Key words: Active control / compressible viscous flow / subsonic evolution.
© EDP Sciences, SMAI, 2001
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.