EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 31 (2025) ESAIM: COCV, 31 (2025) 81 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 31, 2025
Article Number 81
Number of page(s) 34
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2025068
Published online 26 September 2025
  1. V. Barbu, P. Colli, G. Gilardi and G. Marinoschi, Feedback stabilization of the Cahn–Hilliard type system for phase separation. J. Diff. Equ. 262 (2017) 2286–2334. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Caginalp, Conserved-phase field system: implications for kinetic undercooling. Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) 789–791. [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Chen and C. Liu, Optimal distributed control of a Allen–Cahn/Cahn–Hilliard system with temperature. Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021) S1639–S1684. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Colli, G. Gilardi, A. Signori and J. Sprekels, Optimal temperature distribution for a nonisothermal Cahn–Hilliard system with source term. Appl. Math. Optim. 88 (2023) Paper No. 68, 31. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Colli, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Optimal velocity control of a viscous Cahn–Hilliard system with convection and dynamic boundary conditions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56 (2018) 1665–1691. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Frigeri, E. Rocca and J. Sprekels, Optimal distributed control of a nonlocal Cahn–Hilliard/Navier–Stokes system in two dimensions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 54 (2016) 221–250. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Garcke, M. Hinze and C. Kahle, Optimal control of time-discrete two-phase flow driven by a diffuse-interface model. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 25 (2019) Paper No. 13, 31. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Garcke, K.F. Lam and A. Signori, Sparse optimal control of a phase field tumor model with mechanical effects. SIAM J. Control Optim. 59 (2021) 1555–1580. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Hintermüller, M. Hinze, C. Kahle and T. Keil, A goal-oriented dual-weighted adaptive finite element approach for the optimal control of a nonsmooth Cahn–Hilliard–Navier-Stokes system. Optim. Eng. 19 (2018) 629–662. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Hintermüller and T. Keil, Strong stationarity conditions for the optimal control of a Cahn–Hilliard–Navier-Stokes system. Appl. Math. Optim. 89 (2024) Paper No. 12, 28. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Hintermüller and D. Wegner, Distributed optimal control of the Cahn–Hilliard system including the case of a double-obstacle homogeneous free energy density. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012) 388–418. [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Marinoschi, Feedback stabilization of Cahn–Hilliard phase-field systems, in Optimization and Control for Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 29. De Gruyter (2022) 367–392. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Marinoschi, Internal feedback stabilization of a Cahn–Hilliard system with viscosity effects. Pure Appl. Funct. Anal. 3 (2018) 107–135. [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Guzmán, Local exact controllability to the trajectories of the Cahn–Hilliard equation. Appl. Math. Optim. 82 (2020) 279–306. [Google Scholar]
  15. J.W. Cahn and J.E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J. Chem. Phys. 28 (1958) 258–267. [Google Scholar]
  16. H.W. Alt and I. Pawlow, A mathematical model of dynamics of non-isothermal phase separation. Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena 59 (1992) 389–416. [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Shen and S. Zheng, On the coupled Cahn–Hilliard equations. Commun. Part. Diff. Equ. 18 (1993) 701–727. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Prüss and M. Wilke, Maximal Lp-regularity and long-time behaviour of the non-isothermal Cahn–Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions, in Part. Diff. Equ. Funct. Anal.. Springer (2006) 209–236. [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Miranville, The Cahn–Hilliard Equation: Recent Advances and Applications. SIAM (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Fritz, Tumor evolution models of phase-field type with nonlocal effects and angiogenesis. Bull. Math. Biol. 85 (2023) 44. [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Azmi, K. Kunisch and S.S. Rodrigues, Saturated feedback stabilizability to trajectories for the Schlögl parabolic equation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 68 (2023) 7089–7103. [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Kunisch, S.S. Rodrigues and D. Walter, Learning an optimal feedback operator semiglobally stabilizing semilinear parabolic equations. Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021) 277–318. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains. Pitman, Boston, MA (1985). [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Kunisch and S.S. Rodrigues, Explicit exponential stabilization of nonautonomous linear parabolic-like systems by a finite number of internal actuators. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 25 (2019) art67. [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Bey, Simplicial grid refinement: on Freudenthal algorithm and the optimal number of congruence classes. Numer. Math. 85 (2000) 1–29. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Edelsbrunner and D.R. Grayson, Edgewise subdivision of a simplex. Discrete Comput. Geom. 24 (2000) 707–719. [Google Scholar]
  27. S.S. Rodrigues and K. Sturm, On the explicit feedback stabilisation of one-dimensional linear nonautonomous parabolic equations via oblique projections. IMA J. Math. Control Inform. 37 (2020) 175–207. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Wloka, Partial Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press (1987). [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Temam, Navier–Stokes Equations: Theory and Numerical Analysis. AMS Chelsea Publishing, reprint of the 1984 edn. Providence, RI (2001). [Google Scholar]
  30. S.S. Rodrigues, Oblique projection output-based feedback stabilization of nonautonomous parabolic equations. Automatica J. IFAC 129 (2021) art109621. [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Brunk, H. Egger and O. Habrich, On uniqueness and stable estimation of multiple parameters in the Cahn–Hilliard equation. Inverse Probl. 39 (2023) 1454–1478. [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Fritz, On the well-posedness of the Cahn–Hilliard–Biot model and its applications to tumor growth. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 17 (2024) 3533–3563. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Miranville, Existence of solutions to a Cahn–Hilliard type equation with a logarithmic nonlinear term. Mediterr. J. Math. 16 (2019) art. 16. [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Alnæs, J. Blechta, J. Hake, A. Johansson, B. Kehlet, A. Logg, C. Richardson, J. Ring, M.E. Rognes and G. Wells, The FEniCS project version 1.5. Arch. Numer. Softw. 3 (2025) 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  35. C.M. Elliott and A.M. Stuart, The global dynamics of discrete semilinear parabolic equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 30 (1993) 1622–1663. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Deckelnick, G. Dziuk and C.M. Elliott, Computation of geometric partial differential equations and mean curvature flow. Acta Numer. 14 (2005) 139–232. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  37. J.W. Barrett, J.F. Blowey and H. Garcke, Finite element approximation of the Cahn–Hilliard equation with degenerate mobility. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37 (1999) 286–318. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  38. S.S. Rodrigues, Oblique projection exponential dynamical observer for nonautonomous linear parabolic-like equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. 59 (2021) 464–488. RICAM Report no. 2020-33. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  39. S.S. Rodrigues, Semiglobal oblique projection exponential dynamical observers for nonautonomous semilinear parabolic-like equations. J. Nonlinear Sci. 31 (2021) art100. [Google Scholar]
  40. K. Kunisch and S.S. Rodrigues, Global stabilizability to trajectories for the Schlögl equation in a Sobolev norm. Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst. 43 (2023): 2457–2493. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.