EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 32 (2026) ESAIM: COCV, 32 (2026) 47 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 32, 2026
Article Number 47
Number of page(s) 67
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2026030
Published online 15 June 2026
  1. A. Friedman, Stochastic differential games. J. Differ. Equ. 11 (1972) 79–108. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Bensoussan and J. Frehse, Stochastic games for N players. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 105 (2000) 543–565. [Google Scholar]
  3. V.S. Borkar and M.K. Ghosh, Stochastic differential games: occupation measure based approach. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 73 (1992) 359–385. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Bardi and F.S. Priuli, Linear-quadratic N-person and mean-field games with ergodic cost. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52 (2014) 3022–3052. [Google Scholar]
  5. Q. Song, G. Wang, Z.Q. Xu and C. Zhu, Ergodic non-zero sum differential game with Mckean-Vlasov dynamics. preprint arXiv:2505.01972 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  6. J.-M. Lasry and P.-L. Lions, Mean field games. Jap. J. Math. 2 (2007) 229–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Huang, R.P. Malhame and P.E. Caines, Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop McKean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle. Commun. Inform. Syst. 6 (2006) 221–251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Feleqi, The derivation of ergodic mean field game equations for several populations of players. Dyn. Games Appl. 3 (2013) 523–536. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Arapostathis, A. Biswas and J. Carroll, On solutions of mean field games with ergodic cost. J. Math. Pures Appl. 107 (2017) 205–251. [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Cao, J. Dianetti and G. Ferrari, Stationary discounted and ergodic mean field games with singular controls. Math. Oper. Res. 48 (2023) 1871–1898. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Dianetti, G. Ferrari and I. Tzouanas, Ergodic mean-field games of singular control with regime-switching (extended version) preprint arXiv:2307.12012 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Ai'd, M. Basei and G. Ferrari, A stationary mean-field equilibrium model of irreversible investment in a two-regime economy. Oper. Res. 73 (2025) 2351–2374. [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Ferrari and I. Tzouanas, Stationary mean-field games of singular control under Knightian uncertainty. preprint arXiv2505.08317 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Cohen and C. Sun, Existence of optimal stationary singular controls and mean field game equilibria. Math. Oper. Res. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2024.0549. [Google Scholar]
  15. D.A. Gomes, J. Mohr and R.R. Souza, Continuous time finite state mean field games. Appl. Math. Optim. 68 (2013) 99–143. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Cohen and E. Zell, Analysis of the finite-state ergodic master equation. Appl. Math. Optim. 87 (2023) 40. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Cohen and E. Zell, Asymptotic Nash equilibria of finite-state ergodic Markovian mean field games. Math. Oper. Res. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2024.0478. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Carmona and F. Delarue, Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications. I, Mean field FBSDEs, control, and games. vol. 83 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling. Springer, Cham (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Carmona and F. Delarue, Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications. II, Mean field games with common noise and master equations. vol. 84 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling. Springer, Cham (2018). [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Cardaliaguet, F. Delarue, J.-M. Lasry and P.-L. Lions, The Master Equation and the Convergence Problem in Mean Field Games. Princeton University Press (2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Jackson and D. Lacker, Approximately optimal distributed stochastic controls beyond the mean field setting. Ann. Appl. Probab. 35 (2025) 251–308. [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Lacker, S. Mukherjee and L.C. Yeung, Mean field approximations via log-concavity. Int. Math. Res. Notices 2024 (2024) 6008–6042. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Cirant, J. Jackson and D.F. Redaelli, A non-asymptotic approach to stochastic differential games with many players under semi-monotonicity. preprint arXiv:2505.01526 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  24. F.P. Ramsey, A mathematical theory of saving. Econ. J. 38 (1928) 543–559. [Google Scholar]
  25. J. von Neumann, A model of general economic equilibrium. Rev. Econ. Stud. 13 (1945) 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Dorfman, P.A. Samuelson and R.M. Solow, Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. Courier Corporation (1987). [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Porretta and E. Zuazua, Long time versus steady state optimal control. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51 (2013) 4242–4273. [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Damm, L. Grune, M. Stieler and K. Worthmann, An exponential turnpike theorem for dissipative discrete time optimal control problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52 (2014) 1935–1957. [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Trelat and E. Zuazua, The turnpike property in finite-dimensional nonlinear optimal control. J. Differ. Equ. 258 (2015) 81–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Gruine and R. Guglielmi, Turnpike properties and strict dissipativity for discrete time linear quadratic optimal control problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56 (2018) 1282–1302. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Lou and W. Wang, Turnpike properties of optimal relaxed control problems. ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var. 25 (2019) 74. [Google Scholar]
  32. T. Breiten and L. Pfeiffer, On the turnpike property and the receding-horizon method for linear-quadratic optimal control problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 58 (2020) 1077–1102. [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Esteve, H. Kouhkouh, D. Pighin and E. Zuazua, The turnpike property and the longtime behavior of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation for finite-dimensional LQ control problems. Math. Control Signals Syst. 34 (2022) 819–853. [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Zaslavski, Turnpike Properties in the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control, vol. 80. Springer Science & Business Media (2005). [Google Scholar]
  35. D.A. Carlson, A.B. Haurie and A. Leizarowitz, Infinite Horizon Optimal Control: Deterministic and Stochastic Systems. Springer Science & Business Media (2012). [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Gugat, M. Herty and C. Segala, The turnpike property for mean-field optimal control problems. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 35 (2024) 733–747. [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Trelat and E. Zuazua, Turnpike in optimal control and beyond: a survey. preprint arXiv:2503.20342 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Sun, H. Wang and J. Yong, Turnpike properties for stochastic linear-quadratic optimal control problems. Chinese Ann. Math. B 43 (2022) 999–1022. [Google Scholar]
  39. Y. Chen and P. Luo, Turnpike properties for stochastic backward linear-quadratic optimal problems. preprint arXiv:2309.03456 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Conforti, Coupling by reflection for controlled diffusion processes: Turnpike property and large time behavior of Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. 33 (2023) 4608–4644. [Google Scholar]
  41. J. Sun and J. Yong, Turnpike properties for stochastic linear-quadratic optimal control problems with periodic coefficients. J. Differ. Equ. 400 (2024) 189–229. [Google Scholar]
  42. J. Schiefil, M.H. Baumann, T. Faulwasser and L. Grime, On the relationship between stochastic turnpike and dissipativity notions. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 70 (2024) 3527–3539. [Google Scholar]
  43. J. Jian, S. Jin, Q. Song and J. Yong, Long-time behaviors of stochastic linear-quadratic optimal control problems. Appl. Math. Optim. 93 (2026) 46. [Google Scholar]
  44. H. Mei, R. Wang and J. Yong, Turnpike property of stochastic linear-quadratic optimal control problems in large horizons with regime switching I: homogeneous cases. preprint arXiv:2506.09337 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Sun and J. Yong, Turnpike properties for mean-field linear-quadratic optimal control problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 62 (2024) 752–775. [Google Scholar]
  46. E. Bayraktar and J. Jian, Ergodicity and turnpike properties of linear-quadratic mean field control problems. preprint arXiv:2502.08935 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  47. K.L. Helmes, R.H. Stockbridge and C. Zhu, Long-term average impulse control with mean field interactions. preprint arXiv:2505.11345 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  48. P. Cardaliaguet, J.-M. Lasry, P.-L. Lions and A. Porretta, Long time average of mean field games. Netw. Heterogen. Media 7 (2012) 279–301. [Google Scholar]
  49. P. Cardaliaguet, J.-M. Lasry, P.-L. Lions and A. Porretta, Long time average of mean field games with a nonlocal coupling. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51 (2013) 3558–3591. [Google Scholar]
  50. D.A. Gomes, J. Mohr and R.R. Souza, Discrete time, finite state space mean field games. J. Math. Pures Appl. 93 (2010) 308–328. [Google Scholar]
  51. P. Cardaliaguet, Long time average of first order mean field games and weak KAM theory. Dyn. Games Appl. 3 (2013) 473–488. [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Cirant and A. Porretta, Long time behavior and turnpike solutions in mildly non-monotone mean field games. ESAIM: Control Optim. Cal. Var. 27 (2021) 86. [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Cirant and A.R. Meszaros, Long time behavior and stabilization for displacement monotone mean field games. preprint arXiv:2412.14903 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  54. P. Cardaliaguet and A. Porretta, Long time behavior of the master equation in mean field game theory. Anal. PDE 12 (2019) 1397–1453. [Google Scholar]
  55. A. Lachapelle and M.-T. Wolfram, On a mean field game approach modeling congestion and aversion in pedestrian crowds. Transport. Res. B: Methodol. 45 (2011) 1572–1589. [Google Scholar]
  56. D. Bauso, R. Pesenti and M. Tolotti, Opinion dynamics and stubbornness via multi-population mean-field games. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 170 (2016) 266–293. [Google Scholar]
  57. A. Bensoussan, T. Huang and M. Lauriere, Mean field control and mean field game models with several populations. Minimax Theory Appl. 3 (2018) 173–209. [Google Scholar]
  58. M. Cirant, Multi-population mean field games systems with Neumann boundary conditions. J. Math. Pures Appl. 103 (2015) 1294–1315. [Google Scholar]
  59. P. Cardaliaguet, A. Porretta and D. Tonon, A segregation problem in multi-population mean field games. Advances in Dynamic and Mean Field Games: Theory, Applications, and Numerical Methods (2017) 49–70. [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Huang, Large-population LQG games involving a major player: the Nash certainty equivalence principle. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48 (2010) 3318–3353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. M. Nourian and P.E. Caines, e-Nash mean field game theory for nonlinear stochastic dynamical systems with major and minor agents. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51 (2013) 3302–3331. [Google Scholar]
  62. S.L. Nguyen and M. Huang, Linear-quadratic-Gaussian mixed games with continuum-parametrized minor players. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012) 2907–2937. [Google Scholar]
  63. R. Carmona and X. Zhu, A probabilistic approach to mean field games with major and minor players. Ann. Appl. Probab. 26 (2016) 1535–1580. [Google Scholar]
  64. J. Yong and X.Y. Zhou, Stochastic Controls: Hamiltonian Systems and HJB Equations, vol. 43. Springer Science & Business Media (1999). [Google Scholar]
  65. J. Sun and J. Yong, Stochastic Linear-Quadratic Optimal Control Theory: Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Solutions. Springer Nature (2020). [Google Scholar]
  66. P. Lancaster and L. Rodman, Algebraic Riccati Equations. Clarendon Press (1995). [Google Scholar]
  67. M. Bardi, Explicit solutions of some linear-quadratic mean field games. Netw. Heterogen. Media 7 (2012) 243–261. [Google Scholar]
  68. W.H Fleming and H.M. Soner, Controlled Markov Processes and Viscosity Solutions, vol. 25. Springer Science & Business Media (2006). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.