Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 31, 2025
Article Number 77
Number of page(s) 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2025063
Published online 22 September 2025
  1. W.M. Moslem and R. Sabry, Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation for dust ion acoustic waves. Chaos Solitons Fractals 36 (2008) 628–634. [Google Scholar]
  2. H.L. Zhen, B. Tian, H. Zhong et al., Dynamics of the Zakharov-Kuznetsov-Burgers equations in dusty plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 20 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4818508. [Google Scholar]
  3. A.V. Faminskii, An initial-boundary value problem in a strip for two-dimensional Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 116 (2015) 132–144. [Google Scholar]
  4. N.A. Larkin, The 2D Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation on a strip. Bol. Soc. Paranaense Mat. 34 (2016) 151–172. [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Hirayama, Local and global well-posedness for the 2D Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation in low regularity Sobolev space. J. Differ. Equ. 267 (2019) 4089–4116. [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Li, W. Zhang, Z. Li, et al., Qualitative analysis to traveling wave solutions of Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation and its damped oscillatory solutions. Appl. Math. Computat. 236 (2014) 169–183. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Das, N. Ghosh and K. Ansari, Bifurcation and exact traveling wave solutions for dual power Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation with fractional temporal evolution. Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018) 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Das, Exact Traveling Wave Solutions and Bifurcation Analysis for Time Fractional Dual Power Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers Equation. International Conference on Mathematical Modelling and Scientific Computation. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2018) 35-49. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Saez, Symmetry analysis of a generalized 2D Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation with a variable dissipation. J. Math. Chem. 58 (2020) 2415–2424. [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Fukuda and H. Hirayama, Optimal decay estimate and asymptotic profile for solutions to the generalized Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation in 2D. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 79 (2024) 104130. [Google Scholar]
  11. A.A. Agrachev and A.V. Sarychev, Navier–Stokes equations: controllability by means of low modes forcing. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 7 (2005) 108–152. [Google Scholar]
  12. A.A. Agrachev and A.V. Sarychev, Controllability of 2D Euler and Navier–Stokes equations by degenerate forcing. Commun. Math. Phys. 265 (2006) 673–697. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Phan and S.S. Rodrigues, Approximate controllability for Navier–Stokes equations in 3D rectangles under Lions boundary conditions. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 25 (2019) 351–376. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Shirikyan, Approximate controllability of three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 266 (2006) 123–151. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Shirikyan, Control theory for the Burgers equation: Agrachev–Sarychev approach. Pure Appl. Funct. Anal. 3 (2018) 219–240. [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Nersesyan, Approximate controllability of nonlinear parabolic PDEs in arbitrary space dimension. Math. Control Related Fields 11 (2021) 237–251. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Chen, Global approximate controllability of the Korteweg–de Vries equation by a finite-dimensional force. Appl. Math. Optim. 87 (2023) 12. [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Gao, Irreducibility of Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation driven by degenerate noise. ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var. 28 (2022) 20. [Google Scholar]
  19. M.M. Jellouli, Stabilization and control of nonlinear partial differential equations. Université Paris-Saclay; Université de Sousse (Tunisie) (2022). [Google Scholar]
  20. M.M. Jellouli, On the controllability of the BBM equation. Math. Control Related Fields 13 (2023) 415–430. [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimensions. Cambridge university press (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Ferrario, Invariant measures for a stochastic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 26 (2008) 379–407. [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Barbu, The irreducibility of transition semigroups and approximate controllability. Stoch. Part. Differ. Equ. Appl.-VII 21 (2005) 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  24. V. Barbu and G. Da Prato, Irreducibility of the transition semigroup associated with the two phase Stefan problem. Variational Analysis and Applications. Springer, Boston, MA (2005) 147-159. [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Barbu and G. Da Prato, Irreducibility of the transition semigroup associated with the stochastic obstacle Problem. Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quant. Probab. Relat. Top. 8 (2005) 397–406. [Google Scholar]
  26. Z. Dong, F.Y. Wang and L. Xu, Irreducibility and asymptotics of stochastic Burgers equation driven by α–stable. Processes Potential Anal. 52 (2020) 371–392. [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Flandoli, Irreducibility of the 3-D stochastic Navier–Stokes equation. J. Funct. Anal. 149 (1997) 160–177. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Wang, J. Xiong and L. Xu, Irreducibility of stochastic real Ginzburg–Landau equation driven by a-stable noises and applications. Bernoulli 23 (2017) 1179–1201. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  29. O.A. Ladyzhenskaya, V.A. Solonnikov and N.N. Uraltseva, Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island (1968). [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Gao, Stratonovich–Khasminskii averaging principle for multiscale random Korteweg–de Vries–Burgers equation. Nonlinearity 36 (2023) 6124. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Chen and L. Rosier, Exact controllability of the linear Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. B 25 (2020) 3889–3916. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.