EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 31 (2025) ESAIM: COCV, 31 (2025) 62 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 31, 2025
Article Number 62
Number of page(s) 44
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2025048
Published online 18 July 2025
  1. M. Bertalmio, G. Sapiro, V. Caselles and C. Ballester, Image inpainting, Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (USA), SIGGRAPH '00. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (2000) 417-424. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Shen and T.F. Chan, Mathematical models for local nontexture inpaintings. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 62 (2002) 1019-1043. [Google Scholar]
  3. C.-B. Schönlieb, Partial Differential Equation Methods for Image Inpainting, vol. 29. Cambridge University Press (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Bertozzi, S. Esedoglu and A. Gillette, Inpainting of binary images using the Cahn-Hilliard equation. IEEE Trans.Image Process. 16 (2006) 285-291. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Bertozzi, S. Esedoglu and A. Gillette, Analysis of a two-scale Cahn-Hilliard model for binary image inpainting. Multiscale Model. Simul. 6 (2007) 913-936. [Google Scholar]
  6. T.F. Chan and J. Shen, Image processing and analysis. Variational, PDE, wavelet, and stochastic methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2005). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Guillemot and O. Le Meur, Image inpainting: overview and recent advances. IEEE signal Process. Mag. 31 (2013) 127-144. [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Scherzer, Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging. Springer Science & Business Media (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Criminisi, P. Perez and K. Toyama, Region filling and object removal by exemplar-based image inpainting. IEEETrans. Image Process. 13 (2004) 1200-1212. [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Elharrouss, N. Almaadeed, S. Al-Maadeed and Y. Akbari, Image inpainting: a review. Neural Process. Lett. 51 (2020) 2007-2028. [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Bosch, D. Kay, M. Stoll and A.J. Wathen, Fast solvers for Cahn-Hilliard inpainting. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 7 (2014) 67-97. [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Bosch and M. Stoll, A fractional inpainting model based on the vector-valued Cahn-Hilliard equation. SIAM J.Imaging Sci. 8 (2015) 2352-2382. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Burger, L. He and C.-B. Schönlieb, Cahn-Hilliard inpainting and a generalization for grayvalue images. SIAMJ. Imaging Sci. 2 (2009) 1129-1167. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Cherfils, H. Fakih and A. Miranville, A Cahn-Hilliard system with a fidelity term for color image inpainting. J.Math. Imaging Vision 54 (2016) 117-131. [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Cherfils, H. Fakih and A. Miranville, A complex version of the Cahn-Hilliard equation for grayscale image inpainting. Multiscale Model. Simul. 15 (2017) 575-605. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Garcke, K.F. Lam and V. Styles, Cahn-Hilliard inpainting with the double obstacle potential. SIAM J. ImagingSci. 11 (2018) 2064-2089. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Novak and N. Reinic, Shock filter as the classifier for image inpainting problem using the Cahn-Hilliard equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 123 (2022) 105-114. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Theljani, H. Houichet and A. Mohamed, An adaptive Cahn-Hilliard equation for enhanced edges in binary image inpainting. J. Algorithms Comput. Technol. 14 (2020) 10. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Modica and S. Mortola, Un esempio di T-convergenza. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. B 14 (1977) 285-299. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Esedoglu and J. Shen, Digital inpainting based on the Mumford-Shah-Euler image model. European J. Appl.Math. 13 (2002) 353-370. [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Cherfils, H. Fakih and A. Miranville, On the Bertozzi-Esedoglu-Gillette-Cahn-Hilliard equation with logarithmic nonlinear terms. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 8 (2015) 1123-1140. [Google Scholar]
  22. K.F. Lam, Global and exponential attractors for a Cahn-Hilliard equation with logarithmic potentials and mass source. J. Differ. Equ. 312 (2022) 237-275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Miranville, The Cahn-Hilliard equation with a nonlinear source term. J. Differ. Equ. 294 (2021) 88-117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Colli, G. Gilardi, E. Rocca and J. Sprekels, Well-posedness and optimal control for a Cahn-Hilliard-Oono system with control in the mass term. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.-S 15 (2022) 2135-2172. [Google Scholar]
  25. C.G. Gal and A. Poiatti, Unified framework for the separation property in binary phase-segregation processes with singular entropy densities, European J. Appl. Math. 36 (2025) 40-67. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Grasselli and A. Poiatti, The Cahn-Hilliard-Boussinesq system with singular potential. Commun. Math. Sci. 20 (2022) 897-946. [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0,T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 146 (1986) 65-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. E. Casas, J.C. de los Reyes and F. Tröltzsch, Sufficient second-order optimality conditions for semilinear control problems with pointwise state constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 19 (2008) 616-643. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Casas and F. Troöltzsch, Second order analysis for optimal control problems: improving results expected from abstract theory. SIAM J. Optim. 22 (2012) 261-279. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Casas, F. Troltzsch and A. Unger, Second order sufficient optimality conditions for some state-constrained control problems of semilinear elliptic equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. 38 (2000) 1369-1391. [Google Scholar]
  31. F. Troltzsch, Optimal control of partial differential equations: theory, methods and applications. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 112. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2010). [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Abatangelo, C. Cavaterra, M. Grasselli and H. Wu, Optimal distributed control for a Cahn-Hilliard-Darcy system with mass sources, unmatched viscosities and singular potential. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 30 (2024) Paper No. 52, 49. [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Colli, M.H. Farshbaf-Shaker, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Second-order analysis of a boundary control problem for the viscous Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions. Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Math. Appl. 7 (2015) 41-66. [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Colli, A. Signori and J. Sprekels, Second-order analysis of an optimal control problem in a phase field tumor growth model with singular potentials and chemotaxis. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 27 (2021) 73. [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Colli and J. Sprekels, Second-order optimality conditions for the sparse optimal control of nonviscous Cahn- Hilliard systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02384 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Ebenbeck and P. Knopf, Optimal control theory and advanced optimality conditions for a diffuse interface model of tumor growth. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 26 (2020) Paper No. 71, 38. [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Sprekels and F. Troltzsch, Second-order sufficient conditions in the sparse optimal control of a phase field tumor growth model with logarithmic potential. ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var. 30 (2024) 13. [Google Scholar]
  38. E. Casas and F. Troltzsch, Second order optimality conditions and their role in PDE control. Jahresber. Dtsch.Math.-Ver. 117 (2015) 3-44. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.