EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 32 (2026) ESAIM: COCV, 32 (2026) 8 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 32, 2026
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 37
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2025096
Published online 09 February 2026
  1. C.M. Elliott and S. Zheng, On the Cahn-Hilliard equation. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 96 (1986) 339–357. [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Colli, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Recent results on well-posedness and optimal control for a class of generalized fractional Cahn-Hilliard systems. Control Cybernet. 48 (2019) 153–197. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Duan and X. Zhao, Optimal control for the multi-dimensional viscous Cahn-Hilliard equation. Electron. J. Diff. Equ. 2015 (2015) 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Hintermüller and D. Wegner, Distributed optimal control of the Cahn-Hilliard equation including the case of a double-obstacle homogeneous free energy. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012) 388–418. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Zheng, Time optimal controls of the Cahn-Hilliard equation with internal control. Optimal Control Appl. Methods 36 (2015) 566–582. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Zheng and Y. Wang, Optimal control problem for Cahn-Hilliard equations with state constraint. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 21 (2015) 257–272. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Colli, G. Gilardi, E. Rocca and J. Sprekels, Optimal distributed control of a diffuse interface model of tumor growth. Nonlinearity 30 (2017) 2518–2546. [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Colli and A. Signori, Boundary control problem and optimality conditions for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions. Int. J. Control 94 (2021) 1852–1869. [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Colli, A. Signori and J. Sprekels, Optimal control of a phase field system modelling tumor growth with chemotaxis and singular potentials. Appl. Math. Optim. 83 (2021) 2017–2049. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Colli, A. Signori and J. Sprekels, Second-order analysis of an optimal control problem in a phase field tumor growth model with chemotaxis and singular potentials. ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var. 27 (2021) Paper No. 73. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Ebenbeck and P. Knopf, Optimal medication for tumors modeled by a Cahn-Hilliard-Brinkman equation. Calc. Var. Part. Diff. Equ. 58 (2019) Paper No. 131. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Ebenbeck and P. Knopf, Optimal control theory and advanced optimality conditions for a diffuse interface model of tumor Growth. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 26 (2020) Paper No. 71. [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Garcke, K.F. Lam and E. Rocca, Optimal control of treatment time in a diffuse interface model of tumor growth. Appl. Math. Optim. 78 (2018) 495–544. [Google Scholar]
  14. B. You, Optimal distributed control for a Cahn-Hilliard type phase field system related to tumor growth. Math. Control Relat. Fields 14 (2024) 575–609. [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Colli, M.H. Farshbaf-Shaker, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Second-order analysis of a boundary control problem for the viscous Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions. Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Math. Appl. 7 (2015) 41–66. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Colli, M.H. Farshbaf-Shaker, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Optimal boundary control of a viscous Cahn-Hilliard system with dynamic boundary condition and double obstacle potentials. SIAM J. Control Optim. 53 (2015) 2696–2721. [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Colli, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, A boundary control problem for the pure Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 4 (2015) 311–325. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Colli, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, A boundary control problem for the viscous Cahn-Hilliard equation with dynamic boundary conditions. Appl. Math. Optim. 73 (2016) 195–225. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Colli, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, On a Cahn-Hilliard system with convection and dynamic boundary conditions. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 197 (2018) 1445–1475. [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Colli, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Optimal velocity control of a viscous Cahn-Hilliard system with convection and dynamic boundary conditions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 56 (2018) 1665–1691. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Colli, G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Optimal velocity control of a convective Cahn-Hilliard system with double obstacles and dynamic boundary conditions: a 'deep quench' approach. J. Convex Anal. 26 (2019) 485–514. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Gilardi and J. Sprekels, Asymptotic limits and optimal control for the Cahn-Hilliard system with convection and dynamic boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 178 (2019) 1–31. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Rocca and J. Sprekels, Optimal distributed control of a nonlocal convective Cahn-Hilliard equation by the velocity in three dimensions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 53 (2015) 1654–1680. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  24. X. Zhao and C. Liu, Optimal control of the convective Cahn-Hilliard equation. Appl. Anal. 92 (2013) 1028–1045. [Google Scholar]
  25. X. Zhao and C. Liu, Optimal control of the convective Cahn-Hilliard equation in 2D case. Appl. Math. Optim. 70 (2014) 61–82. [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Frigeri, M. Grasselli and J. Sprekels, Optimal distributed control of two-dimensional nonlocal Cahn-Hilliard- Navier-Stokes systems with degenerate mobility and singular Potential. Appl. Math. Optim. 81 (2020) 889–931. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Hintermuller and T. Keil, Strong stationarity conditions for the optimal control of a Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes system. Appl. Math. Optim. 89 (2024) Paper No. 12. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Hintermuller, T. Keil and D. Wegner, Optimal control of a semidiscrete Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes system with non-matched fluid densities. SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 (2018) 1954–1989. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Hintermuller and D. Wegner, Optimal control of a semidiscrete Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes system. SIAM J. Control Optim. 52 (2014) 747–772. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  30. T. Tachim Medjo, Optimal control of a Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes model with state constraints. J. Convex Anal. 22 (2015) 1135–1172. [Google Scholar]
  31. X. Zhao, Optimal distributed control of two-dimensional Navier-Stokes-Cahn-Hilliard system with chemotaxis and singular potential. Appl. Math. Optim. 88 (2023) Paper No. 2. [Google Scholar]
  32. P. Colli, G. Gilardi, E. Rocca and J. Sprekels, Well-posedness and optimal control for a Cahn-Hilliard-Oono system with control in the mass term. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 15 (2022) 2135–2172. [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Gilardi, E. Rocca and A. Signori, Well-posedness and optimal control for a viscous Cahn-Hilliard-Oono system with dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 16 (2023) 3573–3605. [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Abatangelo, C. Cavaterra, M. Grasselli and H. Wu, Optimal distributed control for a Cahn-Hilliard-Darcy system with mass sources, unmatched viscosities and singular potential. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 30 (2024) Paper No. 52. [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Sprekels and H. Wu, Optimal distributed control of a Cahn-Hilliard-Darcy system with mass sources. Appl. Math. Optim. 83 (2021) 489–530. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  36. P. Colli, G. Gilardi, A. Signori and J. Sprekels, Curvature effects in pattern formation: well-posedness and optimal control of a sixth-order Cahn-Hilliard equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 56 (2024) 4928–4969. [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Sprekels and F. Troltzsch, Sparse optimal control of a phase field system with singular potentials arising in the modeling of tumor growth. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 27 (2021) Paper No. S26. [Google Scholar]
  38. G. Stadler, Elliptic optimal control problems with Lx-control cost and applications for the placement of control devices. Comput. Optim. Appl. 44 (2009) 159–181. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  39. E. Casas, R. Herzog and G. Wachsmuth, Analysis of spatio-temporally sparse optimal control problems of semilinear parabolic equations. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 23 (2017) 263–295. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  40. R. Herzog, J. Obermeier and G. Wachsmuth, Annular and sectorial sparsity in optimal control of elliptic Equations. Comput. Optim. Appl. 62 (2015) 157–180. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Herzog, G. Stadler and G. Wachsmuth, Directional sparsity in optimal control of partial differential Equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. 50 (2012) 943–963. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  42. E. Casas and F. Tröltzsch, Second order analysis for optimal control problems: improving results expected from abstract theory. SIAM J. Optim. 22 (2012) 261–279. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. D. Kalise, K. Kunisch and Z. Rao, Infinite horizon sparse optimal control. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 172 (2017) 481–517. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  44. D. Kalise, K. Kunisch and Z. Rao, Sparse and switching infinite horizon optimal controls with mixed-norm penalizations. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 26 (2020) Paper No. 61. [Google Scholar]
  45. E. Otarola, An adaptive finite element method for the sparse optimal control of fractional diffusion, Numer. Methods Part. Diff. Equ. 36 (2020) 302–328. [Google Scholar]
  46. E. Otarola and A.J. Salgado, Sparse optimal control for fractional diffusion. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 18 (2018) 95–110. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  47. E. Casas, C. Ryll and F. Tröoltzsch, Sparse optimal control of the Schlöogl and FitzHugh-Nagumo Systems. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 13 (2013) 415–442. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  48. E. Casas, C. Ryll and F. Tröoltzsch, Second order and stability analysis for optimal sparse control of the FitzHugh- Nagumo equation. SIAM J. Control Optim. 53 (2015) 2168–2202. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  49. P. Colli, A. Signori and J. Sprekels, Optimal control problems with sparsity for phase field tumor growth models involving variational Inequalities. J. Optimiz. Theory Appl. 194 (2022) 25–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. H. Garcke, K.F. Lam and A. Signori, Sparse optimal control of a phase field tumor model with mechanical Effects. SIAM J. Control Optim. 59 (2021) 1555–1580. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  51. E. Casas and K. Kunisch, Optimal control of the two-dimensional evolutionary Navier-Stokes equations with measure valued controls. SIAM J. Control Optim. 59 (2021) 2223–2246. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  52. P. Colli, J. Sprekels and F. Tröoltzsch, Optimality conditions for sparse optimal control of viscous Cahn-Hilliard systems with logarithmic potential. Appl. Math. Optim. 90 (2024) Paper No. 47. [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Sprekels and F. Tröltzsch, Second-order sufficient conditions for sparse optimal control of singular Allen-Cahn systems with dynamic boundary conditions. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 16 (2023) 3784–3812. [Google Scholar]
  54. J. Sprekels and F. Tröltzsch, Second-order sufficient conditions in the sparse optimal control of a phase field tumor growth model with logarithmic potential. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 30 (2024) Paper No. 13. [Google Scholar]
  55. A. Miranville and S. Zelik, Robust exponential attractors for Cahn-Hilliard type equations with singular potentials, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 27 (2004) 545–582. [Google Scholar]
  56. G. Gilardi, A. Miranville and G. Schimperna, On the Cahn-Hilliard equation with irregular potentials and dynamic boundary conditions, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 8 (2009) 881–912. [Google Scholar]
  57. J. Simon, Compact sets in the space Lp(0,T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 146 (1987) 65–96. [Google Scholar]
  58. A.D. Ioffe and V.M. Tikhomirov, Theory of extremal problems. Studies in Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 6. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York (1979). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.