EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 32 (2026) ESAIM: COCV, 32 (2026) 18 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 32, 2026
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 30
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2026002
Published online 10 March 2026
  1. S. Cuomo, V.S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi and F. Piccialli, Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: where we are and what's next. J. Sci. Comput. 92 (2022) 88. [Google Scholar]
  2. I.E. Lagaris, A. Likas and D.I. Fotiadis, Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 9 (1998) 987–1000. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris and G.E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Computat. Phys. 378 (2019) 686–707. [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Hu, K. Shukla, G.E. Karniadakis and K. Kawaguchi, Tackling the curse of dimensionality with physics-informed neural networks. Neural Netw., 176 (2024) 106369 [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Zang, G. Bao, X. Ye and H. Zhou, Weak adversarial networks for high-dimensional partial differential equations. J. Computat. Phys. 411 (2020) 109409. [Google Scholar]
  6. A.D. Jagtap and G.E. Karniadakis, Extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs): a generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations, in AAAI Spring Symposium: MLPS (2021) 2002–2041. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Moseley, A. Markham and T. Nissen-Meyer, Finite basis physics-informed neural networks (fbpinns): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equations. Adv. Computat. Math. 49 (2023) 62. [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Shukla, A.D. Jagtap and G.E. Karniadakis, Parallel physics-informed neural networks via domain decomposition. J. Computat. Phys. 447 (2021) 110683. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Wang, Y. Teng and P. Perdikaris, Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43 (2021) A3055-A3081. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Wang, H. Wang and P. Perdikaris, On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 384 (2021) 113938. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Wang, X. Yu and P. Perdikaris, When and why PINNs fail to train: a neural tangent kernel perspective. J. Computat. Phys. 449 (2022) 110768. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Abdulle, E. Weinan, B. Engquist and E. Vanden-Eijnden, The heterogeneous multiscale method. Acta Numerica 21 (2012) 1–87. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Efendiev, J. Galvis and T.Y. Hou, Generalized multiscale finite element methods (GMsFEM). J. Computat. Phys. 251 (2013) 116–135. [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Iliev, R. Lazarov and J. Willems, Variational multiscale finite element method for flows in highly porous media. Multiscale Model. Simul. 9 (2011) 1350–1372. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Malqvist and D. Peterseim, Localization of elliptic multiscale problems. Math. Computat. 83 (2014) 2583–2603. [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Weinan, B. Engquist and Z. Huang, Heterogeneous multiscale method: a general methodology for multiscale modeling. Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003) 092101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Arbabi, J.E. Bunder, G. Samaey, A.J. Roberts and I.G. Kevrekidis, Linking machine learning with multiscale numerics: data-driven discovery of homogenized equations. JOM 72 (2020) 4444–4457. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Han and Y. Lee, A neural network approach for homogenization of multiscale problems. Multiscale Model. Simul. 21 (2023) 716–734. [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Kropfl, R. Maier and D. Peterseim, Neural network approximation of coarse-scale surrogates in numerical homogenization. Multiscale Model. Simul. 21 (2023) 1457–1485. [Google Scholar]
  20. W.T. Leung, G. Lin and Z. Zhang, NH-PINN: neural homogenization-based physics-informed neural network for multiscale problems. J. Computat. Phys. 470 (2022) 111539. [Google Scholar]
  21. J.S. Richard Park and X. Zhu, Physics-informed neural networks for learning the homogenized coefficients of multiscale elliptic equations. J. Computat. Phys. 467 (2022) 111420. [Google Scholar]
  22. Z. Zhang, C. Moya, W.T. Leung, G. Lin and H. Schaeffer, Bayesian deep operator learning for homogenized to fine-scale maps for multiscale PDE. Multiscale Model. Simul. 22 (2024) 956–972 [Google Scholar]
  23. L.J. Durlofsky, Numerical calculation of equivalent grid block permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media. Water Resources Res. 27 (1991) 699–708 [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Farmer, Upscaling: a review. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 40 (2002) 63–78 [Google Scholar]
  25. X.-H. Wu, Y. Efendiev and T.Y. Hou, Analysis of upscaling absolute permeability. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. B 2 (2002) 185. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Griebel and M. Klitz, Homogenization and numerical simulation of flow in geometries with textile microstructures. Multiscale Model. Simul. 8 (2010) 1439–1460 [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Rahaman, A. Baratin, D. Arpit, F. Draxler, M. Lin, F. Hamprecht, Y. Bengio and A. Courville, On the spectral bias of neural networks, in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR (2019) 5301–5310 [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Tancik, P. Srinivasan, B. Mildenhall, S. Fridovich-Keil, N. Raghavan, U. Singhal, R. Ramamoorthi, J. Barron and R. Ng, Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 33 (2020) 7537–7547 [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Dong, M. Hintermüller and K. Papafitsoros, Optimization with learning-informed differential equation constraints and its applications. ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var. 28 (2022) 3. [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Sirignano, J. MacArt and K. Spiliopoulos, PDE-constrained models with neural network terms: optimization and global convergence. J. Computat. Phys. 481 (2023) 112016. [Google Scholar]
  31. L. Lu, R. Pestourie, W. Yao, Z. Wang, F. Verdugo and S.G. Johnson, Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse design. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43 (2021) B1105-B1132. [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Mowlavi and S. Nabi, Optimal control of PDEs using physics-informed neural networks. J. Computat. Phys. 473 (2023) 111731. [Google Scholar]
  33. E. Casas, Optimal control in coefficients of elliptic equations with state constraints. Appl. Math. Optim. 26 (1992) 21–37 [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Hinze, R. Pinnau, M. Ulbrich and S. Ulbrich, Optimization 'with PDE constraints, vol. 23. Springer Science & Business Media (2008). [Google Scholar]
  35. Y. Shin, Z. Zhang and G.E. Karniadakis, Error estimates of residual minimization using neural networks for linear PDEs. J. Mach. Learn. Model. Comput. 4 (2023) 73–101 [Google Scholar]
  36. R.A. Adams and J.J.F. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces. Elsevier (2003). [Google Scholar]
  37. T. De Ryck, A.D. Jagtap and S. Mishra, Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 44 (2024) 83–119 [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Mishra and R. Molinaro, Estimates on the generalization error of physics-informed neural networks for approximating PDEs. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 43 (2022) 1–43 [Google Scholar]
  39. P. Bochev and M. Gunzburger, Least-squares methods for hyperbolic problems, in Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol. 17. Elsevier (2016) 289–317 [Google Scholar]
  40. P.B Bochev and M.D. Gunzburger, Least-squares Finite Element Methods, vol. 166. Springer Science & Business Media (2009). [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Zeinhofer, R. Masri and K.-A. Mardal, A unified framework for the error analysis of physics-informed neural networks. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2025) 2988–3025 [Google Scholar]
  42. P.L. Lagari, L.H. Tsoukalas, S. Safarkhani and I.E. Lagaris, Systematic construction of neural forms for solving partial differential equations inside rectangular domains, subject to initial, boundary and interface conditions. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 29 (2020) 2050009. [Google Scholar]
  43. N. Sukumar and A. Srivastava, Exact imposition of boundary conditions with distance functions in physics-informed deep neural networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 389 (2022) 114333. [Google Scholar]
  44. I. Guühring, G. Kutyniok and P. Petersen, Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU neural networks in W s, p norms. Anal. Appl. 18 (2020) 803–859 [Google Scholar]
  45. T. De Ryck, S. Lanthaler and S. Mishra, On the approximation of functions by tanh neural networks. Neural Netw. 143 (2021) 732–750 [Google Scholar]
  46. E. Kharazmi, Z. Zhang and G.E. Karniadakis, Variational physics-informed neural networks for solving partial differential equations. Preprint arXiv:1912.00873 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  47. E. Kharazmi, Z. Zhang and G.E. Karniadakis, hp-vpinns: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 374 (2021) 113547. [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Berrone, C. Canuto and M. Pintore, Variational physics informed neural networks: the role of quadratures and test functions. J. Sci. Comput. 92 (2022) 100. [Google Scholar]
  49. J.M. Taylor, D. Pardo and I. Muga, A deep Fourier residual method for solving PDEs using neural networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 405 (2023) 115850. [Google Scholar]
  50. H.N. Mhaskar and N. Hahm, Neural networks for functional approximation and system identification. Neural Computat. 9 (1997) 143–159 [Google Scholar]
  51. T. Xie and F. Cao, The errors of simultaneous approximation of multivariate functions by neural networks. Comput. Math. Appl. 61 (2011) 3146–3152 [Google Scholar]
  52. D. Yarotsky, Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networks. Neural Netw. 94 (2017) 103–114 [Google Scholar]
  53. S. Wang, S. Sankaran, H. Wang and P. Perdikaris, An expert's guide to training physics-informed neural networks. Preprint arXiv:2308.08468 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  54. I. Brevis, I. Muga and K.G. van der Zee, Neural control of discrete weak formulations: Galerkin, least squares & minimal-residual methods with quasi-optimal weights. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 402 (2022) 115716. [Google Scholar]
  55. S.C. Brenner, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Springer (2008). [Google Scholar]
  56. E. Alexandre and J.-L. Guermond, Theory and Practice of Finite Elements. Springer (2004). [Google Scholar]
  57. D.P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. Preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  58. X. Glorot and Y. Bengio, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural Networks, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings (2010) 249–256 [Google Scholar]
  59. S. Goswami, C. Anitescu, S. Chakraborty and T. Rabczuk, Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture. Theoret. Appl. Fract. Mechan. 106 (2020) 102447. [Google Scholar]
  60. C. Xu, B.T. Cao, Y. Yuan and G. Meschke, Transfer learning based physics-informed neural networks for solving inverse problems in engineering structures under different loading scenarios. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 405 (2023) 115852. [Google Scholar]
  61. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio and A. Courville, Deep Learning. MIT Press (2016). [Google Scholar]
  62. V. Jikov, S. Kozlov and O. Oleinik, Homogenization of Differential Operators and Integral Functionals. Springer Science & Business Media (2012). [Google Scholar]
  63. R.M. Christensen, Mechanics of Composite Materials. Courier Corporation (2012). [Google Scholar]
  64. R. Ewing, O. Iliev, R. Lazarov, I. Rybak and J. Willems, A simplified method for upscaling composite materials with high contrast of the conductivity. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31 (2009) 2568–2586 [Google Scholar]
  65. Z.K. Low, N.B., N. Naouar and D. Baillis, Influence of boundary conditions on computation of the effective thermal conductivity of foams. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 155 (2020) 119781. [Google Scholar]
  66. O. Iliev, Z. Lakdawala and V. Starikovicius, On a numerical subgrid upscaling algorithm for Stokes-Brinkman equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 65 (2013) 435–448 [Google Scholar]
  67. F. Chalon, M. Mainguy, P. Longuemare and P. Lemonnier, Upscaling of elastic properties for large scale geomechanical simulations. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 28 (2004) 1105–1119 [Google Scholar]
  68. P. Grisvard, Elliptic Problems in Nonsmooth Domains. SIAM (2011). [Google Scholar]
  69. J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M.J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, et al., Jax: composable transformations of python+ numpy programs (v0. 2.5). Software available from https://github.com/google/jax (2018). [Google Scholar]
  70. A. Logg and G.N. Wells, Dolfin: automated finite element computing. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 37 (2010) 1–28 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.