EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 32 (2026) ESAIM: COCV, 32 (2026) 41 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 32, 2026
Article Number 41
Number of page(s) 43
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2026023
Published online 06 May 2026
  1. A.P. Calderón, On an inverse boundary value problem. Comput. Appl. Math. 25 (2006) 133–138. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Uhlmann, 30 years of Calderón's problem, Seminaire Laurent Schwartz-Équations aux dérivées partielles et applications. Année (2012-2013) 25. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Cheney, D. Isaacson and J.C. Newell, Electrical impedance tomography. SIAM Rev. 41 (1999) 85–101. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Jordana, M. Gasulla and R. Pallás-Areny, Electrical resistance tomography to detect leaks from buried pipes. Meas. Sci. Technol. 12 (2001) 1061–1068. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Sylvester and G. Uhlmann, A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem. Ann. Math. 125 (1987) 153–169. [Google Scholar]
  6. A.L. Bukhgeim and G. Uhlmann, Recovering a potential from partial Cauchy data. Commun. Part. Diff. Equ. 27 (2002) 653–668. [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Isakov, On uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with local data. Inverse Probl. Imaging 1 (2007) 95–105. [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Kenig, J. Sjöstrand and G. Uhlmann, The Calderón problem with partial data. Ann. Math. 165 (2007) 567–591. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Krupchyk and G. Uhlmann, Stability estimates for partial data inverse problems for Schrödinger operators in the high frequency limit. J. Math. Pures Appl. 126 (2019) 273–291. [Google Scholar]
  10. R.-Y. Lai, X. Lu and T. Zhou, Partial data inverse problems for the nonlinear time-dependent Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Math. Anai. 56 (2024) 4712–4741. [Google Scholar]
  11. R.-Y. Lai and T. Zhou, An inverse problem for the non-linear fractional magnetic Schrodinger equation. J. Diff. Equ. 343 (2023) 64–89. [Google Scholar]
  12. R.-Y. Lai and T. Zhou, Partial data inverse problems for nonlinear magnetic Schröodinger equations. Math. Res. Lett. 30 (2023) 1535–1563. [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Zhao and G. Yuan, Stability estimates for an inverse problem for Schroödinger operators at high frequencies from arbitrary partial boundary measurements. Inverse Probl. 39 (2023) 125009, 21. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Kenig and M. Salo, Recent progress in the Calderón problem with partial data, in Inverse Problems and Applications. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 615. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2014) 193–222. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Horváth and Z. Markó, Discrete inverse problems for the Schrodinger operator on the multi-dimensional square lattice with partial Cauchy data. Inverse Probl. 32 (2016) 055006, 9. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Ervedoza and F. De Gournay, Uniform stability estimates for the discrete Calderón problems. Inverse Probl. 27 (2011) 125012, 37. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Lecaros, J.H. Ortega, A. Pérez and L. De Teresa, Discrete Calderón problem with partial data. Inverse Probl. 39 (2023) 035001, 28. [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Robbiano, Fonction de coût et contrôle des solutions des équations hyperboliques. Asymptot. Anal. 10 (1995) 95–115. [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Boyer, V. Hernádez-Santamaría and L.D. Teresa, Insensitizing controls for a semilinear parabolic equation: a numerical approach. Math. Control Reiat. Fieids 9 (2019) 117–158. [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Boyer, F. Hubert and J.L. Rousseau, Discrete Carleman estimates for elliptic operators in arbitrary dimension and applications. SIAM J. Control Optim,. 48 (2010) 5357–5397. [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Boyer, F. Hubert and J.L. Rousseau, Uniform controllability properties for space/time-discretized parabolic equations. Numer. Math. 118 (2011) 601–661. [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Boyer and J.L. Rousseau, Carleman estimates for semi-discrete parabolic operators and application to the controllability of semi-linear semi-discrete parabolic equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire 31 (2014) 1035–1078. [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Cerpa, R. Lecaros, T.N.T. Nguyen and A. Pérez, Carleman estimates and controllability for a semi-discrete fourth-order parabolic equation. J. Math. Pures Appl. 164 (2022) 93–130. [Google Scholar]
  24. T.N.T. Nguyen, Carleman estimates for semi-discrete parabolic operators with a discontinuous diffusion coefficient and applications to controllability. Math. Control Relat. Fields 4 (2014) 203–259. [Google Scholar]
  25. F. Boyer and V. Hernandez-Santamaría, Carleman estimates for time-discrete parabolic equations and applications to controllability. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 26 (2020) 43. [Google Scholar]
  26. P.G. Casanova and V. Hernández-Santamaría, Carleman estimates and controllability results for fully discrete approximations of 1D parabolic equations. Adv. Comput. Math. 47 (2021) 71. [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Lecaros, R. Morales, A. Pérez and S. Zamorano, Discrete Carleman estimates and application to controllability for a fully-discrete parabolic operator with dynamic boundary conditions. J. Diff. Equ. 365 (2023) 832–881. [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Baudouin and S. Ervedoza, Convergence of an inverse problem for a 1-D discrete wave equation. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51 (2013) 556–598. [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Baudouin, S. Ervedoza and A. Osses, Stability of an inverse problem for the discrete wave equation and convergence results. J. Math. Pures Appl. 103 (2015) 1475–1522. [Google Scholar]
  30. W. Zhang and Z. Zhao, Convergence analysis of a coefficient inverse problem for the semi-discrete damped wave equation. Appl. Anal. 101 (2022) 1430–1455. [Google Scholar]
  31. Z. Zhao and W. Zhang, Stability of a coefficient inverse problem for the discrete Schrödinger equation and a convergence result. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 518 (2023) 126665, 25. [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Wu, Y. Wang and Z. Wang, Carleman estimates for space semi-discrete approximations of one-dimensional stochastic parabolic equation and its applications. Inverse Probl. 40 (2024) 115003, 33. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Fernández-Bertolin, L. Roncal, A. Rüland and D. Stan, Discrete Carleman estimates and three balls inequalities. Calc. Var. Part. Diff. Equ. 60 (2021) 28. [Google Scholar]
  34. G. Alessandrini, Stable determination of conductivity by boundary measurements. Appl. Anal. 27 (1988) 153–172. [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Ruland and M. Salo, Quantitative Runge approximation and inverse problems. Int. Math. Res. Not. 20 (2019) 6216–6234. [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Boyer, F. Hubert and J.L. Rousseau, Discrete Carleman estimates for elliptic operators and uniform controllability of semi-discretized parabolic equations. J. Math. Pures Appl. 93 (2010) 240–276. [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Lecaros, J.H. Ortega and A. Pérez, Stability estimate for the semi-discrete linearized Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 27 (2021) 30. [Google Scholar]
  38. A.V. Fursikov and O.Y. Imanuvilov, Controllability of Evolution Equations, Lecture Notes Series, vol. 34. Seoul National University, Research Institute of Mathematics, Global Analysis Research Center, Seoul (1996). [Google Scholar]
  39. J.L. Rousseau and G. Lebeau, On Carleman estimates for elliptic and parabolic operators. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 18 (2012) 712–747. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Bellassoued, Global logarithmic stability in inverse hyperbolic problem by arbitrary boundary observation. Inverse Probl. 20 (2004) 1033–1052. [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Bellassoued and M. Yamamoto, Logarithmic stability in determination of a coefficient in an acoustic equation by arbitrary boundary observation. J. Math. Pures Appl. 85 (2006) 193–224. [Google Scholar]
  42. G. Lebeau and L. Robbiano, Controle exact de l'équation de la chaleur. Commun. Part. Diff. Equ. 20 (1995) 335–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.