Free Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 18, Number 4, October-December 2012
Page(s) 1122 - 1149
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2011192
Published online 16 January 2012
  1. G. Allaire, Conception optimale de structures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2007). [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Alotto, P. Girdinio, P. Molfino and M. Nervi, Mesh adaption and optimization techniques in magnet design. IEEE Trans. Magn. 32 (1996) 2954–2957. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Bangerth and R. Rannacher, Adaptive Finite Element Methods for Differential Equations, Birkhäuser (2003) [Google Scholar]
  4. N.V. Banichuk, A. Falk and E. Stein, Mesh refinement for shape optimization, Struct. Optim. 9 (1995) 46–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Bänsch, P. Morin and R.H. Nochetto, Surface diffusion of graphs : variational formulation, error analysis and simulation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2004) 773–799. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Becker and R. Rannacher, An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods. Acta Numer. 10 (2001) 1–102. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. J.A. Bello, E. Fernandez-Cara, J. Lemoine and J. Simon, The differentiability of the drag with respect to the variations of a Lipschitz domain in a Navier-Stokes flow. SIAM J. Control Optim. 35 (1997) 626–640. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Bonito and R.H. Nochetto and M.S. Pauletti, Geometrically consistent mesh modification. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48 (2010) 1877–1899. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Burger, A framework for the construction of level set methods for shape optimization and reconstruction. Interfaces Free Bound. 5 (2003) 301–329. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Céa, Conception optimale ou identification de formes : calcul rapide de la dérivée directionnelle de la fonction coût. RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 20 (1986) 371–402. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. F. de Gournay, Velocity extension for the level-set method and multiple eigenvalues in shape optimization. SIAM J. Control Optim. 45 (2006) 343–367. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries. SIAM Advances in Design and Control 22 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Demlow, Higher-order finite element methods and pointwise error estimates for elliptic problems on surfaces. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009) 805–827. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Demlow and G. Dziuk, An adptive finite element method for the Laplace-Beltrami operator on implicitly defined surfaces. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2007) 421–442. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Dogan, P. Morin, R.H. Nochetto and M. Verani. Discrete gradient flows for shape optimization and applications. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196 (2007) 3898–3914. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Giles and E. Süli, Adjoint methods for PDEs : a posteriori error analysis and postprocessing by duality. Acta Numer. 11 (2002) 145–236. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Giles, M. Larson, J.M. Levenstam and E. Süli, Adaptive error control for finite element approximation of the lift and drag coefficients in viscous flow. Technical Report 1317 (1997) http://eprints.maths.ox.ac.uk/1317/. [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Girault and P.A. Raviart, Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations : Theory and Algorithms, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics 5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Henderson, ParaView Guide, A Parallel Visualization Application. Kitware Inc. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Lei, J.P. Archie and C. Kleinstreuer, Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. J. Vasc. Surg. 25 (1997) 637–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Mekchay, P. Morin, and R.H. Nochetto, AFEM for Laplace Beltrami operator on graphs : design and conditional contraction property. Math. Comp. 80 (2011) 625–648. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Mohammadi, O. Pironneau, Applied shape optimization for fluids. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001). [Google Scholar]
  23. M.S. Pauletti, Parametric AFEM for geometric evolution equations and coupled fluid-membrane interaction. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI (2008) [Google Scholar]
  24. M.S. Pauletti, Second order method for surface restoration. Submitted. [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Pironneau, On optimum profiles in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 59 (1973) 117–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. O. Pironneau, On optimum design in fluid mechanics. J. Fluid Mech. 64 (1974) 97–110. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Quarteroni and G. Rozza, Optimal control and shape optimization of aorto-coronaric bypass anastomoses. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 13 (2003) 1801–1823. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Rozza, Shape design by optimal flow control and reduced basis techniques : applications to bypass configurations in haemodynamics. Ph.D. thesis, École Polytechnique Fédèrale de Lausanne (2005). [Google Scholar]
  29. J.R. Roche, Adaptive method for shape optimization, 6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Rio de Janeiro (2005). [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Schleupen, K. Maute and E. Ramm, Adaptive FE-procedures in shape optimization. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 19 (2000) 282–302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Schmidt and K.G. Siebert, Design of Adaptive Finite Element Software, The Finite Element Toolbox ALBERTA, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 42. Springer, Berlin (2005). [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Sokołowski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimization. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1992). [Google Scholar]
  33. R.S. Taylor, A. Loh, R.J. McFarland, M. Cox and J.F. Chester, Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting : long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br. J. Surg. 79 (1992) 348–354. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.