EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 31 (2025) ESAIM: COCV, 31 (2025) 71 References
Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 31, 2025
Article Number 71
Number of page(s) 38
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2025045
Published online 29 August 2025
  1. C. Bierig and A. Chernov, Convergence analysis of multilevel Monte Carlo variance estimators and application for random obstacle problems. Numer. Math. 130 (2015) 579–613. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Forster and R. Kornhuber, A polynomial chaos approach to stochastic variational inequalities. J. Numer. Math. 18 (2010) 235–255. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Gwinner, A class of random variational inequalities and simple random unilateral boundary value problems- existence, discretization, finite element approximation. Stoch. Anal. Appl. 18 (2000) 967–993. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Gwinner and F. Raciti, On a class of random variational inequalities on random sets. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 27 (2006) 619–636. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Kornhuber, C. Schwab and M.-W. Wolf, Multilevel Monte Carlo finite element methods for stochastic elliptic variational inequalities. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52 (2014) 1243–1268. [Google Scholar]
  6. R.T. Rockafellar and R.J.-B. Wets, Stochastic variational inequalities: single-stage to multistage. Math. Program. 165 (2016) 331–360. [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Gürkan, A. Yonca Özge and S.M. Robinson, Sample-path solution of stochastic variational inequalities. Math. Program. 84 (1999) 313–333. [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Chen and M. Fukushima, Expected residual minimization method for stochastic linear complementary problems. Math. Oper. Res. 30 (2005) 1022–1038. [Google Scholar]
  9. R.T. Rockafellar and J. Sun, Solving monotone stochastic variational inequalities and complementarity problems by progressive hedging. Math. Program. 174 (2018) 453–471. [Google Scholar]
  10. R.T. Rockafellar and J. Sun, Solving Lagrangian variational inequalities with applications to stochastic programming. Math. Program. 181 (2020) 435–451. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Evgrafov and M. Patriksson, On the existence of solutions to stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 121 (2004) 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Patriksson and L. Wynter, Stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Oper. Res. Lett. 25 (1999) 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Shapiro, Stochastic programming with equilibrium constraints. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 128 (2006) 221–243. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Shapiro and H. Xu, Stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, modelling and sample average approximation. Optimization 57 (2008) 395–418. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Barbu, Optimal control of variational inequalities. Res. Notes Math. 100 (1984).. [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Harder and G. Wachsmuth, Comparison of optimality systems for the optimal control of the obstacle problem. GAMM-Mitteilungen 40 (2018) 312–338. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Hintermüller, An active-set equality constrained newton solver with feasibility restoration for inverse coefficient problems in elliptic variational inequalities. Inverse Probl. 24 (2008) 034017. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Hintermüller and I. Kopacka, Mathematical programs with complementarity constraints in function space: C-and strong stationarity and a path-following algorithm. SIAM J. Optim. 20 (2009) 868–902. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Hintermüller and I. Kopacka, A smooth penalty approach and a nonlinear multigrid algorithm for elliptic MPECs. Computat. Optim. Appl. 50 (2011) 111–145. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Hintermüller, B.S. Mordukhovich and T.M. Surowiec, Several approaches for the derivation of stationarity conditions for elliptic MPECs with upper-level control constraints. Math. Program. 146 (2014) 555–582. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Ito and K. Kunisch, Optimal control of elliptic variational inequalities. Appl. Math. Optim. 41 (2000) 343–364. [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Kunisch and D. Wachsmuth, Path-following for optimal control of stationary variational inequalities. Computat. Optim. Appl. 51 (2012) 1345–1373. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Mignot, Contrôle dans les inéquations variationelles elliptiques. J. Funct. Anal. 22 (1976) 130–185. [Google Scholar]
  24. F. Mignot and J.-P. Puel, Optimal control in some variational inequalities. SIAM J. Control Optim. 22 (1984) 466–476. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  25. T.M. Surowiec, Numerical optimization methods for the optimal control of elliptic variational inequalities, in Frontiers in PDE-Constrained Optimization. Springer (2018) 123–170. [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Wachsmuth, Strong stationarity for optimal control of the obstacle problem with control constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 24 (2014) 1914–1932. [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Schiela and D. Wachsmuth, Convergence analysis of smoothing methods for optimal control of stationary variational inequalities with control constraints. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 47 (2013) 771–787. [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Hertlein, A.-T. Rauls, M. Ulbrich and S. Ulbrich, An inexact bundle method and subgradient computations for optimal control of deterministic and stochastic obstacle problems, in Non-Smooth and Complementarity-Based Distributed Parameter Systems. Springer (2022) 467–497. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Shapiro, D. Dentcheva and A. Ruszczyński, Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory. SIAM, Philadelphia (2009). [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Pflug and W. Römisch, Modeling, Measuring and Managing Risk. World Scientific (2007). [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Whittle, Risk-sensitive linear/quadratic/gaussian control. Adv. Appl. Probab. 13 (1981) 764–777. [Google Scholar]
  32. R.T. Rockafellar and J.O. Royset, Engineering decisions under risk averseness. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A: Civil Eng. 1 (2015) 04015003. [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Kouri and T. Surowiec, Risk-averse optimal control of semilinear elliptic PDEs. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 26 (2019).. [Google Scholar]
  34. D.P. Kouri and T.M. Surowiec, Existence and optimality conditions for risk-averse PDE-constrained optimization. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quant. 6 (2018) 787–815. [Google Scholar]
  35. D.P. Kouri and T.M. Surowiec, Epi-regularization of risk measures. Math. Oper. Res. 45 (2020) 774–795. [Google Scholar]
  36. U.V. Shanbhag, Stochastic variational inequality problems: Applications, analysis, and algorithms, in INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research (2013) 71–107. [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Hille and R.S. Phillips, Functional Analysis and Semi-groups, Vol. 31. American Mathematical Society (1996). [Google Scholar]
  38. B.J. Pettis, On integration in vector spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 44 (1938) 277–304. [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Gunzburger, C. Webster and G. Zhang, Stochastic finite element methods for partial differential equations with random input data. Acta Numerica 23 (2014) 521–650. [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Lord, C. Powell and T. Shardlow, An Introduction to Computational Stochastic PDEs. Cambridge University Press (2014). [Google Scholar]
  41. E. Ullmann, H.C. Elman and O.G. Ernst, Efficient iterative solvers for stochastic Galerkin discretizations of log- transformed random diffusion problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34 (2012) A659–A682. [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Krasnosel’skii, Topological methods in the theory of nonlinear integral equations (1964). Translated by A.H. Armstrong, translation edited by J. Burlak. [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Vainberg, Variational Methods for the Study of Nonlinear Operators. Holden-Day, San Francisco, London, Amsterdam (1964). [Google Scholar]
  44. H. Goldberg, W. Kampowsky and F. Tröltzsch, On Nemytskij operators in Lp-spaces of abstract functions. Math. Nachr. 155 (1992) 127–140. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  45. J.-L. Lions and G. Stampacchia, Variational inequalities. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 20 (1967) 493–519. [Google Scholar]
  46. L. Gasinski and N.S. Papageorgiou, Nonlinear Analysis. Series in Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 9. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL (2006). [Google Scholar]
  47. I. Ekeland and R. Témam, Convex analysis and variational problems. Vol. 28 of Classics in Applied Mathematics, English edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA (1999). Translated from the French. [Google Scholar]
  48. J.-L. Lions, Quelques Methodes de Resolutions des Problémes aux Limites non Linéaires. Dunod, Gauthier-Villars (1969). [Google Scholar]
  49. R. Glowinski, J.-L. Lions and R. Trémolières, Numerical analysis of variational inequalities. Vol. 8 of Studies in Mathematics and its Applications. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York (1981). Translated from the French. [Google Scholar]
  50. J.T. Cal Neto and C. Tomei, Numerical analysis of semilinear elliptic equations with finite spectral interaction. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 395 (2012) 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  51. T. Roubíček, Nonlinear partial differential equations with applications. Vol. 153 of International Series of Numerical Mathematics. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (2005). [Google Scholar]
  52. A. Alphonse, M. Hintermüller and C.N. Rautenberg, Optimal control and directional differentiability for elliptic quasi-variational inequalities. Set-Valued Var. Anal. 30 (2022) 873–922. [Google Scholar]
  53. R.A. Adams and J.J. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, Vol. 140. Elsevier (2003). [Google Scholar]
  54. J.F. Bonnans and A. Shapiro, Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer Science & Business Media (2013). [Google Scholar]
  55. F.H. Clarke, Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. Vol. 5 of Classics in Applied Mathematics, 2nd edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA (1990). [Google Scholar]
  56. J. Milz and T.M. Surowiec, Asymptotic consistency for nonconvex risk-averse stochastic optimization with infinitedimensional decision spaces. Math. Oper. Res. 49 (2024) 1403–1418. [Google Scholar]
  57. R. Johnson and T. Zhang, Accelerating stochastic gradient descent using predictive variance reduction. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 26 (2013).. [Google Scholar]
  58. D.P. Kouri and T.M. Surowiec, A primal–dual algorithm for risk minimization. Math. Program. 193 (2022) 337–363. [Google Scholar]
  59. C. Geiersbach and T. Scarinci, A stochastic gradient method for a class of nonlinear PDE-constrained optimal control problems under uncertainty. J. Differ. Equ. 364 (2023) 635–666. [Google Scholar]
  60. C. Geiersbach and W. Wollner, A stochastic gradient method with mesh refinement for PDE-constrained optimization under uncertainty. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 42 (2020) A2750–A2772. [Google Scholar]
  61. M.S. Alnæs, J. Blechta, J. Hake, A. Johansson, B. Kehlet, A. Logg, C. Richardson, J. Ring, M.E. Rognes and G.N. Wells, The FEniCS project version 1.5. Arch. Numer. Softw. 3 (2015).. [Google Scholar]
  62. D.P. Kouri, M. Staudigl and T.M. Surowiec, A relaxation-based probabilistic approach for PDE-constrained optimization under uncertainty with pointwise state constraints. Computat. Optim. Appl. 85 (2023) 441–478. [Google Scholar]
  63. M. Hintermüller and K. Kunisch, Feasible and noninterior path-following in constrained minimization with low multiplier regularity. SIAM J. Control Optim. 45 (2006) 1198–1221. [Google Scholar]
  64. M. Hintermüller, K. Ito and K. Kunisch, The primal-dual active set strategy as a semismooth newton method. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2002) 865–888. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  65. M. Ulbrich, Semismooth newton methods for operator equations in function spaces. SIAM J. Optim. 13 (2002) 805–841. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.