Open Access
Issue
ESAIM: COCV
Volume 31, 2025
Article Number 87
Number of page(s) 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv/2025074
Published online 05 November 2025
  1. I.C.A. Albuquerque and M.C. Santos, Null controllability and Stackelberg–Nash strategy for a 2 × 2 system of parabolic equations. Port. Math. 81 (2024) 163–200. [Google Scholar]
  2. F.D. Araruna, E. Fernández-Cara, S. Guerrero and M.C. Santos, New results on the Stackelberg-Nash exact control of linear parabolic equations. Syst. Control Lett. 104 (2017) 78–85. [Google Scholar]
  3. F.D. Araruna, E. Fernández-Cara and M.C. Santos, Stackelberg-Nash exact controllability for linear and semilinear parabolic equations. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 21 (2015) 835–856. [Google Scholar]
  4. F.D. Araruna, E. Fernández-Cara and L.C. da Silva, Hierarchic control for the wave equation. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 178 (2018) 264–288. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Carreño and M.C. Santos, Stackelberg–Nash exact controllability for the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation with boundary and distributed controls. J. Differ. Equ. 343 (2023) 1–63. [Google Scholar]
  6. L.L. Djomegne Njoukoué and C. Kenne, Stackelberg exact controllability of a class of nonlocal parabolic equations. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 30 (2024) Paper No. 57. [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Dong, X. Liu and X. Zhang, A class of multi-ob jective control problems for quasi-linear parabolic equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. arXiv:2410.08532v3, in submission. [Google Scholar]
  8. J.-L. Lions, Hierarchic control. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 104 (1994) 295–304. [Google Scholar]
  9. J.-L. Lions, Some remarks on Stackelberg’s optimization. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 4 (1994) 477–487. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Nina-Huamán, Stackelberg–Nash controllability for a quasi-linear parabolic equation in dimension 1D, 2D, or 3D. J. Dyn. Control Syst. 28 (2022) 291–317. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Nina-Huamán and J. LÍmaco, Stackelberg-Nash controllability for N-dimensional nonlinear parabolic partial differential equations. Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021) S1401–S1452. [Google Scholar]
  12. M.R. Nuñez-Chávez and J. LÍmaco, Hierarchical controllability for a nonlinear parabolic equation in one dimension. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 198 (2023) 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Li and J. Yong, Optimal Control Theory for Infinite-Dimensional Systems, Systems Control Found. Appl. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA (1995). [Google Scholar]
  14. X. Liu, Q. Lü and X. Zhang, Finite codimensional controllability and optimal control problems with endpoint state constraints. J. Math. Pures Appl. 138 (2020) 164–203. [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Liu, Q. Lü, H. Zhang and X. Zhang, Finite codimensionality method in infinite-dimensional optimization problems. arXiv:2102.00652v4, in Submission. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Duprez and G. Olive, Compact perturbations of controlled systems. Math. Control Relat. Fields 8 (2018) 397–410. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Peetre, Another approach to elliptic boundary problems. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 14 (1961) 711–731. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Bardos, G. Lebeau and J. Rauch, Un exemple d’utilisation des notions de propagation pour le contrôle et la stabilisation de problèmes hyperboliques, [An example of the use of the notions of propagation for the control and stabilization of hyperbolic problems], Nonlinear hyperbolic equations in applied sciences. Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino, Special Issue (1988) 11–31. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.